Bridget Mary's Reflection:
Jamie L. Manson nails the real issue here! Like the LCWR, Roman Catholic Women Priests offer a new collaborative and non-hierarchical model for Catholics in grassroots communities .You can find our new directory on our website: www.arcwp.org, Bridget Mary Meehan, ARCWP
Within a generation, women religious allowed their organization to evolve from a system of rigid obedience, to a leadership structure that is non-hierarchical and collaborative. And they demonstrated that this type of community and leadership is not only rooted in the gospel values, it is deeply Catholic in spirit, mission, and belief.
"As move toward the eve of what is
undoubtedly the most important general assembly of the Leadership Conference of
Women Religious in the organization’s history, it’s remarkable to take note of
how many articles, commentaries, blogs, and cartoons have been dedicated to the
Vatican’s scrutiny of women religious.
Though much of this writing about LCWR
affirms and supports the sisters, often the comment sections that follow are
laced with a few persistent criticisms. They typically go something like this,
“It doesn’t matter what happens to these women. Their average age is 70, their
numbers are dying out, and no one will care a generation from now. The error of
their ways has caused their decline,” and so forth.
Comments like this are mean-spirited in
many ways, but for me, the real ugliness comes in how profoundly ageist these
sentiments are. Yes, it is true, LCWR is an aging group and the number of women
making vows has diminished significantly over the past several decades. (The
same, of course, can be said of the Roman Catholic clergy in this country, but
traditionalists conveniently overlook that parallel.)
However, just because the majority of women
religious are over sixty, does not make them unworthy of attention. The fact
that they are an aging organization does not mean that what they are doing is
of no value or consequence. The fact that their numbers are shrinking does not
mean that they haven’t made significant contributions to the life of the church
and that their work and witness are not of crucial importance to the future of
the church.
Much of the positive commentary on LCWR has
focused on what the sisters have done on behalf of those facing sickness,
poverty, and other forms of injustice. Less attention has been paid to the “L”
in LCWR: that is, the sisters’ remarkable style of leadership.
Faith-based groups and secular
organizations alike can learn volumes from the ways in which women religious
have allowed their communities to evolve, and the creative impact that this
evolution has had on the way in which they lead their communities.
I recently interviewed a sister for an
article unrelated to the LCWR story. In the course of our conversation, she
talked about entering the convent in 1959 at the age of twenty. She recounted
how “tough” the formation process was in those days.
“They told us what to do. We didn’t have to
think for ourselves,” she told me. In that kind of system, she said, “we didn’t
have to take any responsibility.”
That was what obedience meant to the
sisters back then, and if hierarchy were to have its way, it is the form of
obedience to which women religious would return.
But as the sisters began to implement the
changes of Vatican II, their notions of leadership and obedience expanded. As
LCWR president Sister Pat Farrell told Terry Gross in an interview
with NPR last month [6]: “The word obedience comes from the Latin
root meaning to hear, to listen. And so as I have come to understand that vow,
what it means to me is that we listen to what God is calling us to in the signs
of our times.”
Within a generation, women religious
allowed their organization to evolve from a system of rigid obedience, to a
leadership structure that is non-hierarchical and collaborative. And they
demonstrated that this type of community and leadership is not only rooted in
the gospel values, it is deeply Catholic in spirit, mission, and belief.
For decades the sisters have been doing all
of this transformative work while those who live outside religious communities
were still caught up in the caricatures of nuns peddled by everyone from
Hollywood to the makers of gag gifts like nunzilla or the boxing nun puppet.
Women religious evolved so rapidly and
radically, that most of us didn’t catch up with them until earlier this year,
when the Vatican’s Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith inadvertently cast
a spotlight on their extraordinary lives.
It is true that a small minority of young
Roman Catholics are attracted to the counter-cultural ways of the hierarchy,
which are marked by patriarchal control, absolute obedience, and the conviction
that they are the keepers of unquestionable and unchangeable truths.
But there is more than one way of being
counter-cultural in our society. My sense is that more young people are
interested in learning from the counter-cultural model exhibited by women
religious, which is marked by non-authoritarian leadership, collaborative
decision-making, and missions that are driven by actively listen to the needs
of the larger community.
The LCWR’s general assembly is a testimony
to the nature of the sisters’ leadership style. As is the case with previous
assemblies, hours have been set-aside for information-sharing, communal
contemplation, and executive sessions where members will exchange ideas about
next steps.
Of course, given the weight of the issues
they will discern at this year’s gathering, more hours than usual will be
devoted to these kinds of meetings.
Women religious have taught us how to be
church not simply in the work they do with the marginalized, but in the way in
which they organize and lead themselves.
They have set an important precedent,
especially for new generations who are exploring ways to develop forms of
leadership that are trustworthy, who want to do faith-based, social justice
organizing that is free of an evangelical agenda, and who are looking for a
tradition that will ground their beliefs and deepen their spiritualties.
They taught young girls and African
American children because they knew they would not get an education otherwise.
They tended to wounded Confederate and Union soldiers, because, unlike the
armies, they had the experience of running over a dozen hospitals. Their
unyielding commitment to the poor and the sick also helped mitigate the
anti-Catholic sentiment that existed in the U.S. in the nineteenth and early
twentieth century.
But all along, they have been laboring on
another frontier as well. They have been at forming a vision of what inclusive,
collaborative, engaged leadership might look like in the Catholic church.
The way in which women religious work --
from their formation process to their engagement with the modern world to their
leadership style -- is decades, if not centuries, ahead of the hierarchy that is
now attempting to control them.
They have created among themselves a form
of church that so many restless Catholics long for: small, supportive,
non-hierarchical, intimate communities that are deeply rooted in tradition,
devoted to sacramental life, and grounded in outreach to the poor and
marginalized.
If we look closely, we might find that they
have created and continue to create a model of that church that many of us
dream about. "
[Jamie L. Manson received her Master of
Divinity degree from Yale Divinity School, where she studied Catholic theology
and sexual ethics. Her columns for NCR earned her a first
prize Catholic Press Association award for Best Column/Regular Commentary in
2010.]
NCR will be reporting
live from the LCWR assembly all this week. Check daily for coverage. For
related coverage on the gathering, see:
