tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2153529381521594901.post3806189033280525054..comments2023-12-27T18:36:13.163-05:00Comments on Bridget Mary's Blog: "The Time is Now for Restructuring the Roman Catholic Church" by Alice IaquintaBridget Mary Meehanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10921879459312121740noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2153529381521594901.post-69594247730839747382010-03-27T18:11:39.327-04:002010-03-27T18:11:39.327-04:00Thank you for listing your blogspot. I will visit...Thank you for listing your blogspot. I will visit it.<br /><br />I had a fine evening. Watched some TV and then read a novel until after midnight. And now, the dogs are asleep and I am devoting the next few hours to theological concerns -- including writing arguments and mini-treatises. And tonight I hope to get a large chunk of that novel finished by switching from one realm of the imagination to another.Ravensbarquehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06104864903011454678noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2153529381521594901.post-6342563266763614612010-03-27T14:06:15.629-04:002010-03-27T14:06:15.629-04:00Ravensbarque:
Again, here is my blogspot:
"...Ravensbarque:<br /><br />Again, here is my blogspot:<br /><br />"Rockinapologist.blogspot.com"<br /><br />Yes, indeed I have having a fine evening. Hope you did too! Hope you are having a nice day for that matter!The Catholic Apologisthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11346882586629450512noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2153529381521594901.post-74885421695093136002010-03-27T00:22:59.289-04:002010-03-27T00:22:59.289-04:00Antagonist --
You clearly have a problem with Chu...Antagonist --<br /><br />You clearly have a problem with Church history. In the early church, the VOTE was critically important. Check it out and prove me wrong. But, please, DOCUMENT what you are saying. I am not interested in sweeping generalities or in believing anything you say just because you say it.<br /><br />You speak of priests being "Spiritual Fathers" and what that means, etc. Please give me a time frame. And please DOCUMENT what you are saying.<br /><br />You discount social justice. How then do you interpret the Sermon on the Mount and the Sermon on the Plain? We could throw in John 13 just for fun. That is where the summation of the gospel can be found.<br /><br />BTW -- social justice does NOT equal a redistribution of wealth and control. Check it out! Get your definitions and your history straight.<br /><br />No one is putting man (HUMAN) at the center of worship -- rather than God. I have no idea where you came up with that idiotic idea! It simply does not make sense. If I am missing something, please DOCUMENT where I have gone wrong.<br /><br />Your last two paragraphs appear to be dillusional. Please clarify -- with DOCUMENTATION.<br /><br />Hope you are having a nice evening!Ravensbarquehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06104864903011454678noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2153529381521594901.post-44456521988082494352010-03-26T18:49:16.396-04:002010-03-26T18:49:16.396-04:00Let me translate this whole post:
Take the Church...Let me translate this whole post:<br /><br />Take the Church as we know it and turn it into a democracy whereby people vote on what the Church should teach and believe.<br /><br />A Church where by the priests go from being Spiritual "Fathers" to their people, and being a true shepherd to their people to being the "Collaboraters in Chief" who are lead by the people they are supposed to be leading, and dare not do anything that egad, might "offend" someone, unless said offense is in the name of the goddess of "Social Justice."<br /><br />A Church that preaches a gospel of "Social Justice" (read: redistribution of the wealth and government control) rather then the Gospel of Christ.<br /><br />A Church whereby man is at the center of worship rather then God.<br /><br />A Church whose Gospel is the gospel of humanism, liberalism, modernism, and atheism. (read: Deism, or Paganism)<br /><br />A Church that believes nothing, yet everything at the same time and in the same sense. A Church which does not recognize a Universal Truth, but rather a subjective, evolving, changing truth that depends upon the consent of the people.<br /><br />Bridget Mary, why do you want a Church like this? Why even HAVE a Church like this? What is the point?The Catholic Apologisthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11346882586629450512noreply@blogger.com