Translate

Tuesday, August 25, 2026

Where Is the Spirit Calling Women Today? The Changing Face of Women’s Religious Life by Bridget Mary Meehan



The statistics are startling, but they require careful qualification. The most recent national study of U.S. women religious by the Center for Applied Research in the Apostolate (CARA), based on data collected in 2022, reported 31,742 sisters in 411 institutes, with an average age of 80.5. Only 1.1 percent were age 30 or younger.[^1]

These figures reveal a profound change in religious life—but not necessarily its death. The old forms of convent-based vocation are declining, while new forms of discipleship, ministry and spiritual community are emerging beyond traditional structures.

I know something about religious life from the inside.

I entered the Immaculate Heart of Mary Sisters in 1966, when convents were filled with young women and religious communities staffed Catholic schools, hospitals, parishes and social-service institutions throughout the country.

It was an extraordinary time. I received a world-class education in the novitiate and a degree from Immaculata College to prepare me to teach in elementary schools.

Women religious were among the best-educated women in the Church. They became teachers, theologians, nurses, hospital administrators, social workers, pastoral ministers and advocates for justice. They served immigrants and people experiencing poverty, marched for civil rights and peace, challenged unjust corporate practices and advocated for the protection of Earth.[^2]

They were—and still are—prophetic women whose selfless service has blessed countless lives.

So when I hear that the decline in numbers proves that progressive religious life has failed, I strongly disagree.

The more important question is not simply: Why aren’t young women becoming nuns?

It is: Where is the Spirit calling women today?

Vatican II Opened the Windows

The Second Vatican Council called religious institutes to renew themselves by returning to the spirit and intentions of their founders while responding to the signs of the times. Perfectae Caritatis explicitly directed religious communities toward this renewal, while Gaudium et Spes challenged the entire Church to discern the presence and action of God in the contemporary world.[^3]

Women religious took that invitation seriously.

They studied Scripture and theology. They rediscovered the radical message of Jesus. They listened to the experiences of women, people living in poverty and marginalized communities. Many moved from large convents into neighborhoods where people were struggling and became deeply involved in movements for justice, peace and ecological sustainability.

And they began asking questions the institutional Church did not necessarily want women to ask.

Why are women barred from sacramental leadership?

Why is decision-making predominantly in the hands of ordained men?

Why does a Church that proclaims the equality of all the baptized maintain structures that discriminate against women?

My own awareness deepened dramatically in 1979 when Sister Teresa Kane, RSM, welcomed Pope John Paul II to the National Shrine of the Immaculate Conception in Washington, D.C. and publicly asked that women be included in all ministries of the Church. I stood among sisters from religious communities across the United States as she spoke.

It felt as if the ceiling might collapse!

Her courageous words articulated what many Catholic women were already experiencing: the Spirit was calling women into forms of ministry that the institutional Church was unwilling to recognize.[^4]

Those questions have not disappeared.

They are even more pressing today.

Young Women Have Choices Their Grandmothers Never Had

For generations, religious life provided Catholic women with opportunities that were rarely available elsewhere. Sisters could pursue higher education, become teachers, principals, nurses, hospital administrators and missionaries, travel throughout the world and exercise significant leadership.

Historians of women religious have documented their crucial role in building the educational, health-care and social-service institutions that served generations of Americans.[^2]

Today, women can pursue similar vocations outside convent walls.

A young woman inspired to serve God and others can become a theologian, doctor, teacher, chaplain, community organizer, environmental advocate, nonprofit leader, spiritual director or minister.

The Spirit continues to call women.

The ways of answering that call have expanded.

Perhaps the container is evolving.

This is why I resist describing the aging of religious communities simply as a “vocation crisis.”

Perhaps we are witnessing something much larger.

The traditional container for women’s religious vocation may be disappearing while new forms of discipleship are being born.

We can already see them.

Women are forming intentional spiritual communities, creating house churches and inclusive Catholic communities, and serving as theologians, spiritual directors, chaplains, retreat leaders, activists and ministers.

Some Catholic women—including women who have belonged to canonical religious communities—are also answering calls to ordained ministry despite the institutional Church’s refusal to recognize their vocations.

The Roman Catholic Women Priests movement ordains women as deacons, priests and bishops and understands these ordinations as valid within the Roman Catholic sacramental tradition. The institutional Roman Catholic Church does not recognize these ordinations and continues to teach that it has no authority to ordain women to the priesthood.[^5]

In the Roman Catholic Women Priests movement, I have witnessed women answering the Spirit’s call to serve inclusive communities where all are welcome at the Eucharistic table.

We are exploring something different: a community of equals in which leadership is shared, authority is relational and ministry grows from the gifts of the baptized.

This, too, is religious vocation.

Their Charisms Will Live On

As communities of religious women age and some congregations move toward completion, we should be profoundly grateful for the legacy they leave behind.

Generations of sisters educated children, established hospitals, cared for people who were poor, accompanied immigrants, advocated for peace and justice and nurtured the spiritual lives of millions.[^2]

Many continued their prophetic ministry even when Church authorities investigated, criticized or attempted to silence them. The Vatican’s doctrinal assessment of the Leadership Conference of Women Religious, which culminated in the 2012 mandate for reform, is an important example of the institutional tensions that shaped this period.[^6]

These women taught us something essential: faithfulness to the Gospel sometimes requires prophetic obedience to the Spirit in the face of institutional resistance.

Their communities may become smaller. Some congregations may eventually disappear.

But their charisms will not disappear.

Many religious communities have developed networks of associates, companions and lay partners who share their spirituality and are committed to carrying their missions into the future.[^7]

The structures may change.

The charisms—Mercy, Charity, Providence, Peace, Justice, Healing, Education and Compassion—can continue in new forms.

Something New Is Being Born

So when I hear that the average Catholic sister in the United States is around 80 and that scarcely one percent are young women, I feel sadness because an extraordinary generation of women is passing from our midst.

But I also feel profound hope.

Christian history teaches us that spiritual movements are born, flourish, change and sometimes give way to something new.

I believe the Holy One is still calling women today.

Calling women to justice work and educational initiatives serving marginalized communities.

Calling women to preach.

Calling women to preside at Eucharist.

Calling women to sacramental ministry.

Calling women to create new forms of spiritual community that we cannot yet fully imagine.

Perhaps, then, the vocation crisis is something quite different from what we think.

Perhaps the Spirit is doing what She has always done—moving beyond our boundaries, disrupting our expectations and birthing something new.

And perhaps our task is not to mourn the disappearance of one form of religious life, but to recognize, bless and nurture the new life already emerging among us.


Footnotes

[^1]: Center for Applied Research in the Apostolate (CARA), Population Trends among Religious Institutes of Women in the United States, data collected in 2022. CARA reported 31,742 sisters in 411 responding institutes, an average age of 80.5, and 1.1 percent age 30 or younger. See also CARA, “Frequently Requested Church Statistics,” Georgetown University. These figures should not be interpreted as a census of every Catholic woman religious or every Catholic woman engaged in ministry.

[^2]: Margaret M. McGuinness, Called to Serve: A History of Nuns in America (New York: New York University Press, 2013); Suellen Hoy, Good Hearts: Catholic Sisters in Chicago’s Past (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2006). These histories document the enormous contribution of women religious to education, health care, social services and public life in the United States.

[^3]: Second Vatican Council, Perfectae Caritatis: Decree on the Adaptation and Renewal of Religious Life, October 28, 1965, especially §§2 and 20; Second Vatican Council, Gaudium et Spes: Pastoral Constitution on the Church in the Modern World, December 7, 1965, especially §§4 and 11.

[^4]: On October 7, 1979, Sister Theresa Kane, RSM, then president of the Leadership Conference of Women Religious, welcomed Pope John Paul II at the Basilica of the National Shrine of the Immaculate Conception in Washington, D.C. In the presence of the pope, she called upon the Church to provide “the possibility of women as persons being included in all ministries of our Church.” Her intervention became a landmark moment in the history of Catholic women’s advocacy for equality in ministry.

[^5]: See Roman Catholic Women Priests, “About Us” and “Frequently Asked Questions,” for the movement’s understanding of its ordinations and apostolic succession. For the institutional Roman Catholic Church’s position, see John Paul II, Ordinatio Sacerdotalis, May 22, 1994, especially §4, which states that the Church has “no authority whatsoever to confer priestly ordination on women.” See also Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, General Decree regarding the delict of attempted sacred ordination of a woman, December 19, 2007.

[^6]: Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Doctrinal Assessment of the Leadership Conference of Women Religious, culminating in the mandate announced April 18, 2012. The mandate initiated a period of Vatican oversight of LCWR. The process concluded in 2015.

[^7]: See Leadership Conference of Women Religious materials on the changing landscape of religious life and Catholic Religious Vocation Network resources concerning associates and lay partners. Such relationships vary considerably among congregations and do not ordinarily constitute canonical membership in a religious institute.

I used ChatGPT as an editorial tool to help refine this article, reduce repetition, improve organization, and assist with research and footnotes. The ideas, theological perspective, personal experiences, conclusions, and final editorial decisions are my own.



Called to serve, but not welcome to stay: Why this Medina woman pursued priesthood Ideastream Public Media | By Richard Cunningham




“Susan Russell was ordained by an organization called Roman Catholic Womenpriests, and serves as a priest at a faith community in Brecksville, but the Catholic Church doesn't recognize her ordination…

Susan Russell started working as a social worker in 2004, and even opened her own practice in 2024. But she always felt a deeper calling for her life. When an opportunity arose to go deeper into her faith and become a priest, she took it. She now works as a priest at the Community of St. Bridget, a faith community in Brecksville.”

See full article 

https://www.wvxu.org/2026-08-25/called-to-serve-but-not-welcome-to-stay-why-this-medina-woman-pursued-priesthood

A Renewed Priestly Ministry Is Changing the Church Today

The 72 Community celebrate community in a home in Dublin

A Renewed Priestly Ministry Is Changing the Church Today

Ordination should be understood as service within the whole baptized community, not membership in a spiritual hierarchy.

In the Association of Roman Catholic Women Priests, we seek a model of ministry rooted in Gospel equality, shared leadership, inclusive communities and justice. ARCWP describes this vision as “a renewed model of ordained ministry in an inclusive community of equals.” (ARCWP⁠)

Inclusive Catholic communities are already changing what priestly ministry looks like today. In these communities, the priest is a spiritual leader who shares ministry with the entire community. 

People gather around an open table where all are welcome; homilies can become communal reflections in which the wisdom and lived experience of the people are heard; Eucharistic prayers can be shared; and decisions about worship, ministry and community life can be made collaboratively. The sacraments belong to the whole church, not to the clergy alone. In this circular model of church, ordained ministers preside while also empowering others to claim their baptismal gifts and participate fully in the life of the community. Women priests in inclusive communities  have intentionally developed participatory approaches to liturgy, sacramental ministry and decision-making as alternatives to exclusively top-down models of church. (ARCWP⁠)

This transformation is about far more than adding women to the existing clerical structure. We are not seeking simply to ordain women into a patriarchal priesthood; we are helping to birth a renewed priestly ministry within communities of equals. The movement from hierarchy toward circles of shared leadership, from exclusion toward an open table, and from clerical control toward baptismal empowerment represents a different way of being church. Here, the priest’s vocation is not to stand above the community but to walk with it—listening, accompanying, blessing, presiding and calling forth the gifts of others.

Women’s ordination can therefore contribute to a much larger renewal of Catholic life. The goal is not simply equality at the altar, but a church transformed by Gospel equality—a community in which all the baptized recognize themselves as beloved images of God, gifted by the Spirit and called to participate in Christ’s mission.

See www.arcwp.org for list of women priests -led communities and RCWP-USA website.



Randall Balmer’s article, “Southern Baptists, Roman Catholics & A New (I Think) Argument for Women’s Ordination,” challenges a familiar objection: Jesus chose male apostles, so ordained ministers must always be male.[^1]


https://goodfaithmedia.org/by-the-way-southern-baptists-roman-catholics-a-new-i-think-argument-for-womens-ordination/


Randall Balmer’s article, “Southern Baptists, Roman Catholics & A New (I Think) Argument for Women’s Ordination,” challenges a familiar objection: Jesus chose male apostles, so ordained ministers must always be male.[^1]

Balmer asks a simple question: If the apostles’ maleness is permanently binding, why isn’t their Jewish identity? The Twelve were Jewish men shaped by a particular first-century culture, yet most Christian traditions do not believe that only Jewish men can be ordained.[^2]

This comparison exposes the central problem: why should gender alone be treated as a permanent qualification while other features of the apostles’ identity are understood historically? The question does not settle every debate about Paul’s letters, church tradition or sacramental theology, but it requires opponents of women’s ordination to explain why maleness should permanently disqualify women from ordained ministry.

The case for women’s ordination rests on a broader biblical and theological vision.

Jesus Called Women to Discipleship and Witness

The Gospels show women traveling with Jesus, supporting his ministry and witnessing his crucifixion, burial and resurrection. Luke names Mary Magdalene, Joanna and Susanna among those who accompanied him (Luke 8:1–3).[^3]

Mary Magdalene stands at the center of the Easter story. In John’s Gospel, the risen Christ sends her to the disciples, and she returns with the message:

> “I have seen the Lord.” 
> —John 20:18

The other Gospels also identify women as the first witnesses to the empty tomb and the resurrection message (Matthew 28:1–10; Mark 16:1–8; Luke 24:1–12). Later Christian tradition called Mary Magdalene “apostle to the apostles,” recognizing the authority of her proclamation.[^4]

If women were entrusted with Christianity’s foundational announcement, the resurrection, then the church should not exclude them from proclaiming and embodying that Gospel through ordained ministry.

Baptism and the Discernment of Ministry

Paul writes:

“There is no longer Jew or Greek, there is no longer slave or free, there is no longer male and female; for all of you are one in Christ Jesus.” 
—Galatians 3:28

Paul emphasizes unity and equality in Christ, while the New Testament describes spiritual gifts as coming from the Holy Spirit rather than being reserved for men (Romans 12:3–8; 1 Corinthians 12:4–31).[^5]

Ministry, therefore, should be discerned through gifts, calling and the recognition of the community—not gender alone. Baptism, not maleness, is the foundation of Christian identity and vocation.

Women in the Earliest Churches

The New Testament also records women exercising meaningful leadership. Paul calls Phoebe a diakonos - deacon- of the church at Cenchreae and a benefactor of many, including himself (Romans 16:1–2).[^6] He greets Prisca and Aquila as fellow workers in Christ (Romans 16:3–5), and Acts describes them teaching Apollos together (Acts 18:24–26).[^7]

Romans 16:7 refers to Junia as prominent among the apostles.[^8] Women also appear as patrons, coworkers, prophets and hosts of house churches. Paul assumes that women pray and prophesy in Christian worship (1 Corinthians 11:5).

Historian Gary Macy has documented women’s leadership in medieval ecclesial and liturgical ministry. Because the meaning of “ordination” varied across periods and institutions, this history challenges the assertion that women’s ordained ministry has no precedent.[^9]

The Deeper Question: How Do We Understand God and Sacramental Representation?

The deepest issue concerns how we understand God, Christ, the church and the meaning of sacramental representation.

The strongest objection begins with a serious Christian claim: Jesus Christ was historically male. In the Eucharist, the priest acts in persona Christi—in the person of Christ—and some theologians therefore argue that a male priest is required to represent the male Jesus sacramentally. They also appeal to apostolic succession: Christ chose male apostles, the apostles entrusted ministry to male successors, and the church has preserved that pattern through its ordained tradition. On this view, priestly symbolism is not merely a matter of social custom but a visible sign of Christ’s identity and the church’s continuity with the apostles.[^10]

These arguments deserve a direct response.

First, Jesus’ maleness is real, but it does not mean that every priest must reproduce every feature of his historical identity. Jesus was also Jewish, first-century Palestinian, unmarried and a particular individual with a particular body and voice. Priests do not represent Christ by duplicating all these characteristics.They represent Christ through the church’s sacramental action, proclamation of the Gospel, and pastoral service .

Second:The risen Christ is not confined to a male body. In baptism, Christians are incorporated into Christ: “As many of you as were baptized into Christ have clothed yourselves with Christ” (Galatians 3:27). If all the baptized participate in Christ, then women can represent Christ as members of his body, called and gifted by the Spirit.

Third: The apostles were Jewish, yet the church does not require Jewish ethnicity for priestly ministry. They were also drawn from a particular social and cultural setting, yet the church has recognized ministers across nations, languages and cultures. The question, then, is whether maleness is uniquely essential to apostolic succession or whether it has been treated as essential because patriarchal societies assumed that leadership was naturally male. I believe the latter is true.

Fourth. A priest represents Christ, but a priest also represents the church, the baptized community and humanity gathered before God. The Eucharist is not a dramatic reenactment in which the priest must physically resemble Jesus; it is the sacramental action of the whole church in which Body of Christ - the people of God -is the true celebrant- not the priest alone. A woman priest can therefore signify Christ’s self-giving love while also making visible the truth that women, fully and equally, belong to Christ’s body and share in his mission.

Christian theology teaches that God is not a male human being and is not limited by human sex or gender. Genesis says:

 “God created humankind in the divine image…male and female God created them.” 
—Genesis 1:27

Women and men and all genders reflect the image of God. Ordination therefore, does  not depend on biological maleness but on baptism, call, community affirmation and oneness in Christ.

Apostolic succession is best understood as fidelity to the apostles’ Gospel and mission, not as the preservation of every feature of their historical circumstances. And priestly symbolism reveals Christ’s inclusive humanity and loving  service rather than reinforcing a hierarchy in which men alone are permitted to stand for Christ. Every baptized person represents Christ.

The Roman Catholic magisterium teaches that the church lacks authority to ordain women, while many other Christian traditions reject that conclusion.[^11]

In my view, ordination should be understood as service within the whole baptized community, not membership in a spiritual hierarchy.

In the Association of Roman Catholic Women Priests, we seek a model of priestly ministry rooted in Gospel equality, shared leadership, inclusive communities and justice. Church renewal requires accountability, collaboration, pastoral care, economic justice and the participation of the entire baptized community.[^12]

This understanding of women’s  ordination contributes to that renewal by helping create a priestly ministry grounded in service and shared responsibility in inclusive communities of equals. See www.arcwp.org for list of women priests -led communities and RCWP-USA website.

https://arcwp.org/ministries/inclusive-catholic-communities/


https://www.romancatholicwomenpriests.org/find-community/


The Church Is Already Changing in our world today.

Women already preach, teach theology, lead communities, accompany the dying, baptize, witness marriages and serve in many other forms of ministry. Some preside at the Eucharist in churches that ordain women; others do so in communities whose sacramental status is rejected by churches such as the Roman Catholic Church.[^13]

The question is not whether women are capable of ministry or whether they experience genuine calls to ordained service. Many clearly do. The question is whether churches will recognize those calls and revise theological, canonical and sacramental systems that exclude women.

Randall Balmer concludes that it may be time to revisit the familiar arguments against women’s ordination. I agree.

The Gospel calls the church to follow Jesus, recognize the gifts of the Spirit and seek justice.

Women are called.

Many churches ordain women.

Women are already leading communities of faith in many ways.

Through them—and through all whose gifts have been pushed to the margins—the church can become more faithful to its baptismal vocation: a community where everyone is welcomed at the table and encouraged to serve according to the gifts of the Spirit.

The Spirit is not waiting for the church to decide whether women may lead.  The  Spirit is already at work. 

Read Randall Balmer’s original article in Good Faith Media.

[^1]: Randall Balmer, “By the Way: Southern Baptists, Roman Catholics & a New (I Think) Argument for Women’s Ordination,” Good Faith Media, August 13, 2025, https://goodfaithmedia.org/by-the-way-southern-baptists-roman-catholics-a-new-i-think-argument-for-womens-ordination.

[^2]: Balmer’s comparison is an argument about consistency: if one historical characteristic of the apostles is treated as permanently normative, other characteristics may require the same treatment unless a theological reason is given for distinguishing them.

[^3]: Luke 8:1–3 identifies Mary Magdalene, Joanna, Susanna and “many others” as women who accompanied Jesus and supported his ministry.

[^4]: The title “apostle to the apostles” appears in Christian tradition and is associated especially with Mary Magdalene’s role as the first witness and messenger of the resurrection. See, for example, Hippolytus of Rome, Commentary on the Song of Songs 25.6.

[^5]: These passages describe the diversity of gifts within the body of Christ and attribute them to God’s grace and the Holy Spirit. 

[^6]: The Greek term diakonos can mean “deacon.” Its precise institutional meaning in Romans 16:1 is debated but the passage clearly presents Phoebe as an important leader  of the church at Cenchreae.

[^7]: Prisca is named before Aquila in Romans 16:3 and Acts 18:26, a detail some scholars regard as evidence of her prominence in the early Christian mission.

[^8]: The interpretation of Romans 16:7 is debated. Some translations render Junia as “well known to the apostles,” while others understand the phrase to mean that she was “prominent among the apostles.” The name Junia is widely recognized by contemporary scholarship as a woman’s name.

[^9]: Gary Macy, The Hidden History of Women’s Ordination: Female Clergy in the Medieval West (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008).

[^10]: For a classic Roman Catholic formulation of the argument that priestly representation requires a male minister, see Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Inter Insigniores: Declaration on the Question of Admission of Women to the Ministerial Priesthood (1976), especially sections 4–5.

[^11]: See Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Inter Insigniores (1976); John Paul II, Ordinatio Sacerdotalis (1994); and Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Responsum ad Dubium Concerning the Teaching Contained in Ordinatio Sacerdotalis (1995). Anglican, Lutheran, Methodist, Presbyterian, United Church of Christ and many other Christian traditions ordain women, though practices vary by denomination.

[^12]: The Association of Roman Catholic Women Priests is part of the Roman Catholic Womenpriests movement, which describes its ministry as rooted in prophetic obedience, gender equality and inclusive sacramental communities. The Roman Catholic Church does not recognize these ordinations as valid and regards them as contrary to canon law.

[^13]: Churches that ordain women include many Anglican, Lutheran, Methodist, Presbyterian, Baptist and other Protestant bodies, as well as some Old Catholic and independent Catholic communities. Recognition of ordination and sacramental validity varies among churches.

(ChatGPT was used as an editorial assistant in organizing this article but content reflects author’s theology and ecclesiology. )