Doctrine and Life
Vol 63 No. 4 April 2013
A Veteran
Journalist’s
First Conclave
JOHN COONEY
" IN ALL
my 43 years as a journalist, I never had the occasion to report
a papal
conclave. Thankfully, this omission has been rectified with
the arrival
of the 266th papacy. In spite of a harsh wet Roman evening
on Wednesday
March 13, it was an unforgettable moment to witness
the election of the
Cardinal Archbishop of Buenos Aires, Jorge Mario
Bergoglio, and to hear
him take the name of Pope Francis. Although a
bit uncomfortable with
the unbridled ultramontane enthusiasm of the
vast crowd in St Peter’s
Square, I too came under Francis’s trinitarian
spell of humility,
simplicity and spontaneity.
On his awaited appearance on the loggia, my
first impression was
that he looked like Pope Paul VI, then I felt he
looked like Pius XI.
Certainly not a Pius XII, and not a showman like
John Paul II or in the
diffident manner of Benedict XVI. The more
permanent resemblance
was that of John Paul I, the smiling
Pope.
Growing up in the west of Scotland back in the 1950s as part of
the Catholic Irish diaspora in which the Pope was our unquestioned
spiritual leader, I remember watching the election on our recently
acquired television set of Pope John XXIII in 1958, and that of Paul
VI in 1963 with my late aunt Mary who was on holiday in her native
Blantyre, having gone to Philadelphia in the depressed 1920s to earn
her way in life across the Atlantic as there was no prospect of
employ
ment in Scotland.
When John Paul I was elected in 1978,
the year of the three popes,
I was in America on a travelling
scholarship, and later that year when
Pope John Paul II took the
Vatican by storm, I watched his bravura
balcony speech on a television
set in the press room of the EU Council
of Ministers in
Luxembourg.
In 2005 when the white smoke ascended for Joseph Ratzinger,
I
was involved journalistically; but my reporting was from Dublin for
The Evening Herald and as a studio commentator with presenter Claire
Byrne on TV3. At least I was getting closer to being a Vaticanologist,
so
much so that last October I represented Doctrine & Life at the
fiftieth
anniversary of the Second Vatican Council, which coincided
with the
Synod of Bishops on New Evangelisation and the launch of the
Year
of Faith. 1.
THE NAME FRANCIS
On my return to Dublin last autumn I was speaking to the art critic,
Kevin Ruttledge, and told him of my feeling that Pope Benedict XVI
had
aged and would resign rather than die slowly and publicly as did
John
Paul II. Little did I imagine, however, that five months later I
would
return to St Peter’s Square following Benedict’s freely offered
resignation on February 11 to see the welcome given to the first Jesuit
Pope, the first Pope from Latin America – and, hopefully, potentially
the first truly collegial Bishop of Rome, instead of the Supreme Pontiff
on the authoritarian model of my boyhood.
Francis is a big name
in the Cooney family. My late father was Francis
and my elder son was
baptized Francis by the late Fr Austin Flannery,
O.P., and Monsignor
John Greehy, the late parish priest of Terenure.
My aunt Mary was the
housekeeper of the pastor of St Francis of Assisi
Church in
Springfield, Pennsylvania.
A ROOM WITH A VIEW
On a tight budget which was Franciscan in its economy I booked to
fly
to Rome with Aer Lingus on Sunday March 10, returning Saturday
March
16. By Friday March 8, I was in a panic about accommodation
as hotels I
knew were full.
Then a touch of inspiration produced the solution.
Bridget Mary
Meehan, who had spoken at the Humbert Summer School in
County
1. John Cooney, ‘A Pilgrimage, a Council and a Synod’, Doctrine
& Life, November 2012.
Mayo in 2010,
emailed with the
address in Rome of Janice Sevré-Duszynska, a minister of the
Association of Roman Catholic Women Priests, which counts approximately 150
women priests in Europe, the U.S., Canada and Latin America. Indeed,
thanks to the
Italian police, I was able to identify Janice from the
publicity she got on RTÉ television
and major world networks on
Thursday March 7 when she was filmed being temporarily
detained by the
Italian constabulary for demonstrating in St Peter’s Square vested
in
her alb and green stole. For her trouble, Janice was released but the
police confiscated her banner proclaiming ‘Women Priests are here’.
I
ascertained that Janice was staying at a Carmelite convent guest-
house
on the Via Paolo III, half an hour’s walk from the Vatican. My
email
seeking accommodation for six nights was dispatched to Sister
Angela
that Friday evening and to my relief by Saturday lunchtime I
had
secured a room en-suite with a shower and breakfast for the bar
gain
price of 55 euro a night plus a 2 euro City of Rome tax. The downside
was that all guests had to be in the convent by 11 p.m. This convent
curfew would mean no late-night bar-stooling with other journalists
in
the Piazza Navona.
Thus, on my arrival in Rome at mid-day on Sunday
March 10, I was
taken straight by taxi to my humble quarters. I paid
the frivolous fee
for six nights accommodation and was given the key to
apartment 229.
Spartan it might be, but from my balcony when I opened
the shutter,
I had a splendid view of the basilica dome, the
magnificent, silver cupola
of St Peter’s. Suddenly, I was close to the
action in the Apostolic
Palace, where history would unfold.
THE PRESS CORPS
As the sun was shining, I walked to
the Vatican without my coat
and umbrella, forgetting that rain was
forecast from late afternoon. I
headed to the Borgo Pio, where I was
ushered to an outdoor table for
those wishing to eat al fresco. This
was the same restaurant, Marcello,
where in 1971 during the Synod of
Bishops which I was covering for
The Glasgow Herald, I was initiated
into Vatican reportage by the Irish
press corps. I toasted my glass to
the memories of Seán MacRéamoinn,
Joe Power, Kevin O’Kelly and Gary
MacEoin, ecstatically in communion
with their eternal spirits in the
kingdom of the saints, national union
of journalists branch.
By
now, the temperature had fallen dramatically and rain was brood
ing in
the air. So I scampered to the nearby Piazza Risorgimento in
pulsating
rain to meet Patsy McGarry of The Irish Times. Patsy had wisely
kept
his coat on and was carrying an umbrella as his shield from the
torrential downfall. An easing of the rain led us to bolt to our separate
destinations. To my dismay, it proved impossible to flag-down a taxi.
So I stated walking up the steep winding road bordering the walls of
the Vatican in a merciless thunderstorm, taking a wrong turn and
doubling the time it took to get to my casa.
After changing
into dry clothing I wandered into a common room
to watch television
which was already switched on by an absorbed
woman whom I recognized as
Janice Sevré-Duszynska. We talked for
several hours and I took note of
her planned activities. Next morning
at breakfast, I joined Janice who
was in company with fellow guests
who included women canon lawyers,
nuns and Catholic activists. A
yardstick for measuring the conclave
proceedings was that the Church’s
foremost need was to elect a pope who
was an administrator to clean
up the Curia; otherwise it was dead in
the water.
PREDICTIONS
> Monday March 11 was the
last day of the pre-conclave discussions.
> Scholars and scribes flooded
the Tiber with their prescriptions. I
> joined in the punditry on an RTÉ
radio interview with Fergal Keane
> for Mary Wilson’s Drivetime. We did
it on a street beside a restaurant
> on the Piazza Risorgimento. Asked
what I wished from the conclave, I called
> for the next pope to confer
an intellectual amnesty which would end the clamp
> -down on theologians
and would invite all the cardinals to express their true
> thoughts
rather than mouth the curial line on issues deemed to be
> closed
including contraception, married male priests, women priests,
> gay
marriage and same sex unions. This should be a prelude to a
> reopening
of these issues in tandem with a curial reform that would
> send the old
guard to Coventry. All cardinal electors should take as
> their bedtime
reading Mary McAleese’s book, Quo Vadis? Collegiality in the
> Code of
Canon Law.
> On the morning of Tuesday, March 12, after an early rise I
was
> interviewed for the BBC World Ser vice by Nuala McGovern, an
> Irishwoman, at the Beeb’s stand on the Piazza Pio XII. Initially, I was
> booked to do one slot on the reaction of public opinion in Ireland to
> Pope Benedict’s resignation, my answer being that he had reduced
> the papacy to a job and that Ireland was on the left of the Vatican and
> wanted real change towards democratic decision-making. My stint
> expanded into three slots, the second of which was to identify three
> papal front-runners.
> I picked Cardinal Angelo Scola of Milan,
whom I had met at a con
> ference of Christian Democrats in September 2010
in Cracow, Poland,
> where he spoke on ‘The Christians’ Contribution to
the European
> Integration Process’. While he was affable and
approachable, I said
> his speech was too philosophical and I predicted
he would bore for
> the papacy.
> Cardinal Marc Ouellet of Quebec
was well placed as Prefect of the
> Congregation of Bishops, with an
impressive presence at ceremonies
> as he demonstrated last June when he
was papal legate at the World
> Eucharistic Congress in Dublin. I also
contended that he took clerical
> paedophilia seriously, having held
meetings in Ireland with victims
> of clerical sexual abuse which
included spending an hour with Mark
> Vincent Healy, a victim of a
Spiritan cleric and now a victims’ crusader.
> Thirdly, I named Cardinal
Louis Antonio Taglé of Manila who impressed
> Fr Seán McDonagh recently
in Dublin. But I felt he might be considered
> too young at 53. I ruled
out an American pope.
> The third slot was to say when we would see white
smoke. ‘On
> Wednesday or Thursday’, I forecast. That lunchtime the first
ballot
> elicited black smoke and as I headed with the disappointed crowd
> towards the Borgo Santa Anna, I bumped into Mary McAleese and her
> husband Martin. This was fortuitous, as for some time I had been trying
> to track Mary down in Rome to arrange an interview for a biography
> of Cardinal Desmond Connell.
>
> AN ALTERNATIVE
GATHERING
>
> That afternoon ahead of the cardinal electors
entering the conclave, I taxied
> to the mountain ridge of the Piazza
Garabaldi, close to the statue of the leader
> who in 1870 captured Rome
and effectively ended centuries of the papacy’s
> temporal power. There
Janice and women activists from the U.S., Canada, Australia
> and Europe
raised pink smoke flares to promote their case for the ordination of women
> to the priesthood. This event highlighted the lack of women’s voices
> among the pope-makers and decision-makers in the Church. ‘We must
> as a matter of justice claim for women our equal rights to be
ordained,’
> said Janice Sevré-Duszynska. ‘We do this by contra legem
[against the
> law]. We are breaking an unjust law. Yet we remain within
the Roman
> Catholic Church. The sacrament of Orders comes from our
Baptism,
> not from our gender.’
> In pelting rain interspersed
with thunder and lightning, Erin Salz
> Hanna, executive director of
Women’s Ordination Conference, called
> for an official reopening of the
discussion on women’s ordination. The
> people of the Church, she said,
are desperate for a leader who will be
> open to dialogue and embrace the
gifts of women’s wisdom in every
> level off church governance.
>
Miriam Duignan, communications coordinator of Women Can Be
> Priests,
said that the election of a new pope was a rare opportunity
> for the
Church to reconsider its systems of governance, to introduce a
> more
democratic system of electing leaders and to reassess the leaders’
>
accountability to the faithful.
> Just five hours before Cardinal
Bergolio was elected pontiff in the
> Sistine Chapel on Wednesday March
13, I was present in a downtown
> schoolroom for immigrants in the Via
Ostiense where Janice Sevré-
> Duszynska intoned: ‘The Vatican gives
flowers to women, but what
> women really want is full equality. Women
priests are here!’ Janice’s
> ordination in 2008 was attended by Fr Roy
Bourgeois who gave her a
> blessing, which led to his excommunication by
the Congregation for
> the Doctrine of the Faith and his removal from the
Mayknoll Order. 2
> In a statement of support for Fr Bourgeois issued in
December
> 2012, the Association of Catholic Priests (Ireland) condemned
this
> type of action as ‘unjust, and ultimately counter-productive’ and
it
> 2. Roy Bourgeois, M.M., My Journey from Silence to Solidarity,
Edited by Margaret
> Knape, fxBear, Yellow Springs, Ohio, 2012.
>
called on the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith ‘to restore
> Fr
Bourgeois to the full exercise of his ministry and to allow for open
>
and honest discussion on issues that are of crucial importance for the
>
future of the Church.’
>
> A POPE FOR THE POOR
>
> It
was on Tuesday evening that Cardinal Bergoglio emerged as Pope
> Francis.
Among his many homely gestures and bons mots my favourite
> is: ‘The
Church is not just another human organisation. We can walk
> as much as
we want, we can build many things, but if we do not profess
> Jesus
Christ, things go wrong. We may become a charitable NGO, but
> not the
Church, the Bride of the Lord’.
> On a sunny Thursday morning I
participated at Cardinal Seán
> Brady’s press conference at the
Pontifical Irish College, where it
> emerged that the Primate of All
Ireland had made a prophetic intervention
> during the pre-conclave
meetings by suggesting that the new pope should be
> marked by a love of
the poor. Speaking, too, about his conversation with Pope
> Francis after
his election, he said he will be inviting him to Ireland when an
>
appropriate occasion arises.
> At his first press conference, the Pope
said he was inspired to take
> the name because Francis was ‘a man of the
poor’, a ‘man of peace’
> and a man who ‘loved and cared for
creation.’
> Afterwards I went to lunch with Cardinal Brady’s spokesman,
Martin Long, and
> Michael Kelly, the editor of the Irish Catholic, at
which we discussed what kind of pope
> Francis would be, with me
stressing he be collegial and bring an end to the People of God’s
> trek
in the wilderness. While we shared a mood of optimism, Martin quipped that
> he had heard my interview with Fergal Keane but did not agree with
> one word I had said!
>
> WILL WE HAVE A VATICAN III
?
>
> On a sunny Saturday March 16 at the end of my six days
amongst
> women, to borrow from the title of a John McGahern novel, as
the Aer
> Lingus plane crossed the Alps, I thought of Lord Acton’s dictum
that
> ‘absolute power corrupts absolutely’ and hoped that under Francis
that
> kind of absolutism will be corrected. It was clear to me from
Cardinal
> Brady’s enthusiasm that Bergoglio’s election gave him a
landslide
> mandate to reform the Curia. It remains to be seen if he will
translate
> his charisma into effective action and pick a team who will
implement
> changes, a team which might find places for the respective
talents of
> Cardinal Brady and the Archbishop of Dublin, Diarmuid
Martin.
> However, on account of the Argentine Pope’s theological
conservatism, I expect
> that there will be many disappointments for
advocates of sweeping change. To avoid
> this, I would hope that Pope
Francis summons a Third Vatican Council whose composition
> would extend
to representatives of the clergy and laity as well as the world’s bishops. Its
> aim would be to complete the unfinished business of Vatican II. Indeed,
> perhaps the next time I travel to Rome those awesome ultramontane
> peaks will look less imperial and more collegial."
>
>
(John Cooney, a historian, is also a journalist specialising in religious
> affairs.)
No comments:
Post a Comment