I was ordained in the Roman Catholic Womenpriests Movement on July 31, 2006, aboard the Riverboat Majestic near Pittsburgh. That ordination marked both the culmination of a lifelong journey toward Gospel equality and the beginning of a new chapter of writing, organizing, speaking, and documenting a prophetic movement for change in the Roman Catholic Church.
Long before ChatGPT, I wrote about women’s equality, inclusive Catholic communities, spirituality, healing, and the Womenpriests Movement. My blog archives begin in 2007. In an April 20 reflection, “The Time Has Come for Ordaining Women,” I described women as equal images of the Holy and Womenpriests as offering “a renewed priestly ministry in a community of equals.”[^1]
During the movement’s early years, I helped communicate our mission to the media, often issuing statements in the movement’s name rather than my own. We were building a movement, not promoting individuals. The message belonged to all of us.
Now, nearly two decades later, artificial intelligence is helping me recover and reconnect with that history:
AI is helping me find my own history.
AI Helps Me Find What I Already Wrote
One of the most valuable ways I use ChatGPT is not to replace my writing but to locate, organize, and document work I have already done.
Over the years, my writing has appeared in books, blogs, websites, press releases, media statements, theological reflections, prayers, liturgies, educational materials, interviews, and documents connected with Roman Catholic Womenpriests and the Association of Roman Catholic Women Priests.
Sometimes I remember an idea but not where I first expressed it. At other times, I recognize a phrase and think, “I know I wrote about this years ago—but where?” I also occasionally discover that something I wrote for the movement is still circulating online without my name attached.
AI can help me follow these threads.
The Roman Catholic Womenpriests resource collection identifies a historical overview of women priests in the Catholic tradition that I coauthored with Olivia Doko and Victoria Rue.[^4] In 2008, I coedited Women Find a Way: The Movement and Stories of Roman Catholic Womenpriests with Elsie Hainz McGrath and Ida Raming.[^5] In 2010, I published Living Gospel Equality Now: Loving in the Heart of God—A Roman Catholic Woman Priest Story, bringing together memories, spirituality, inclusive liturgies, and the developing history of the movement.[^6]
These sources establish a historical trail. When AI helps me locate an old article or statement, it is not creating my theology. It is helping me recover ideas I have been developing for years.
Recovering the Story of a Movement
This work matters because the history of Roman Catholic Womenpriests needs to be preserved.
In the movement’s early years, we were making history while trying to explain it. Women were being ordained, inclusive communities were emerging, journalists were asking questions, and Vatican officials were condemning our ordinations. Catholics around the world were discovering that women were claiming their calls to ordained ministry.
Someone had to tell that story. I was one of the people doing so.
The historical record confirms this public role. In 2007, the National Catholic Reporter profiled me as one of the women priests helping shape the emerging movement.[^7] Other contemporary sources document my work communicating its vision and serving as a media contact.[^8]
Because many statements were issued collectively, my name may not appear on documents I remember writing. AI is useful here as a research assistant: it can help identify phrases, dates, related documents, and archived material that I can then examine and verify.
This is not AI creating my history. It is helping me recover it.
There is something moving about encountering words from years ago and realizing: I wrote that. I remember the women involved, the excitement surrounding an ordination, the opposition, and the effort to explain that women priests were not leaving the Church but working prophetically for its renewal.
I coined a seven-second sound bite for reporters: “We’re not leaving the Church—we’re leading it!”
We believed we were not simply placing women within an old clerical system. We were helping birth a renewed model of priestly ministry rooted in communities of equals.
Finding those early statements can feel like opening a family album. There we are—the movement in its early years, using words before we knew where the journey would lead. Sometimes I find my own words still circulating without my name attached.
That makes me smile. They served the movement.
My Voice Did Not Begin with ChatGPT
My writing voice did not begin with ChatGPT. Long before generative AI existed, I was writing about the themes central to my ministry: women’s equality, inclusive Eucharistic communities, the equality of the baptized, feminist theology, healing, justice, the Divine Presence within creation, and the transformation of priestly ministry.
My writing from 2007 demonstrates that continuity.[^9] My later work, including Living Gospel Equality Now, continued developing a spirituality of Gospel equality and a renewed priesthood.[^10] I am still writing about these themes today.
The technology is new. My voice is not.
AI did not create these convictions. They were shaped by life, community, study, prayer, the courageous people with whom I have journeyed, the Roman Catholic Womenpriests Movement, and my encounters with the Holy One.
AI as a Research Assistant
I think of ChatGPT primarily as a research, organizational, and editorial assistant.
I can bring it something I wrote fifteen years ago and ask it to compare that reflection with my current work. I can ask it to locate an earlier statement about apostolic succession, Gospel equality, or inclusive priestly ministry, or to identify where I developed a particular theological idea.
It can reduce repetition, organize material, clarify paragraphs, and identify places where documentation is needed.
But I must verify the sources. AI may help me find the trail; I still have to follow it.
AI Cannot Replace Lived Theology
There is also something AI cannot do.
It can organize information about Roman Catholic Womenpriests, but it did not stand with us at an ordination. It can explain excommunication, but it has never experienced what it means to be told by one’s Church that answering God’s call places a person outside institutional boundaries.
It can generate sentences about Eucharist, but it has never gathered around an open table with a community celebrating that everyone belongs. It can write about courage, but it has never had to risk anything.
AI can generate thousands of words about the Holy One, but it cannot encounter the Holy One.
Lived experience therefore remains indispensable to theology and ministry.
From Fear to Discernment
Our response to AI should be neither fear nor uncritical enthusiasm. It should be discernment.
We need to ask:
Is AI helping me think, or doing my thinking for me?
Is it helping me recover my own work, or manufacturing something I never said?
Am I checking its sources and verifying quotations?
Does the final writing reflect my convictions, experience, theology, and voice?
Can I take responsibility for every word I publish?
For students, ministers, theologians, and writers, these questions are more useful than simply asking, “Did you use ChatGPT?”
The better question is: “How did you use it?”
The Gift of Looking Back—and Moving Forward
At this stage of my life and ministry, one of AI’s greatest gifts is helping me look backward so I can move forward.
I have a substantial body of work behind me—books, articles, blog posts, prayers, liturgies, educational materials, media statements, interviews, and movement documents. AI can help me rediscover, organize, and document some of it.
Occasionally, it helps me find something I had almost forgotten. When that happens, I smile and think, “Well, Bridget Mary, you were saying that long before ChatGPT came along!”
Artificial intelligence does not have to diminish the human voice. Used wisely, transparently, and ethically, it can help us recover, preserve, strengthen, document, and share that voice with a new generation.
For me, AI has become a surprising companion—not writing my story, but helping me find pieces of the story I have already lived and written.
Footnotes
[^1]: Bridget Mary Meehan, “The Time Has Come for Ordaining Women,” Bridget Mary’s Blog, April 20, 2007.
[^2]: Women’s Ordination Conference and Roman Catholic Womenpriests, “Ordained Catholic Women and Advocates Present a New Vision of Church,” media release, November 7, 2007. The release lists Bridget Mary Meehan as an RCWP media contact.
[^3]: Women’s Ordination Conference, “Directory of Catholic Women Ministers,” entry for Bishop Bridget Mary Meehan. The directory identifies Meehan as the media contact for Roman Catholic Womenpriests in North America.
[^4]: Bridget Mary Meehan, Olivia Doko, and Victoria Rue, “A Brief Overview of Womenpriests in the History of the Roman Catholic Church,” listed in the Roman Catholic Womenpriests resource collection.
[^5]: Elsie Hainz McGrath, Bridget Mary Meehan, and Ida Raming, eds., Women Find a Way: The Movement and Stories of Roman Catholic Womenpriests (Virtualbookworm.com Publishing, 2008).
[^6]: Bridget Mary Meehan, Living Gospel Equality Now: Loving in the Heart of God—A Roman Catholic Woman Priest Story (2010).
[^7]: Pamela Schaeffer, “Ordaining Women: Profiles of Five Women Priests,” National Catholic Reporter, December 7, 2007.
[^8]: Women’s Ordination Conference and Roman Catholic Womenpriests, “Ordained Catholic Women and Advocates Present a New Vision of Church,” November 7, 2007; Women’s Ordination Conference, “Directory of Catholic Women Ministers.”
[^9]: Meehan, “The Time Has Come for Ordaining Women.”
[^10]: Meehan, Living Gospel Equality Now.
Note on AI Assistance
I used ChatGPT as a research, brainstorming, organizational, and editorial tool in developing this article. It helped me locate and reconnect with earlier writings about the Roman Catholic Womenpriests Movement, including blog posts and historical materials from the movement’s early years. It also assisted in identifying sources for documentation.
I reviewed the material, verified the sources, revised the text, and made the final editorial decisions. The experiences, theological perspectives, memories, convictions, and voice expressed here are my own.

